| INTERNATIONAL LAW | UNITED STATES LAW | LAW SEARCH ENGINE |
|
MAINSTREET
Attorney Yellow Pages The Internet Lawyer Directory |
LAWRESEARCH
Membership To The Largest Internet Law Library |
SHERLOCK
Be Your Own Internet Private Investigator |
By: Sergio R. Karas, B.A., LL.B.
Karas
& Associates - In Affiliation With
Hirson Wexler Perl
Practice
limited to U.S. and Canadian Immigration and Nationality Law
Sergio R. Karas is a Canadian lawyer, practising in the area of
Immigration Law in Toronto. He is a member of the board of directors of several
community organizations, and a regular speaker at international legal seminars.
His comments and opinions are general and are not intended to be interpreted
with respect to any specific situation.
He can be reached at Karas & Associates, (416) 506-1800 or
through e-mail at skaras@hirson.com.
On
February 21, 2001, the Government of Canada tabled in Parliament Bill C-11, the
Immigration and Refugee Protection Act which, if approved, will
introduce sweeping changes to Canadian immigration law and policies and will
have consequences for all categories of applicants.
The
main proposed changes are as follows:
FAMILY
CLASS IMMIGRATION
o
Expanding the definition of “family class” raising the
age of a “dependent child” from the current 19 years old to 22 years old;
o
Opening up adoption provisions in keeping with the
principles of “best interest of the child”, as articulated by Canadian courts;
o
Changing the definition of “family” to include common law
and same-sex partners;
o
Facilitating family reunification by creating an
in-Canada landing class for sponsored spouses and partners for both immigrants
and refugees;
o
Exempting sponsored spouses, partners and dependent
children from the admission bar with regard to excessive demand on health or
social services;
o
Reducing the age at which Canadian citizens and permanent
residences are eligible to sponsor from 19 to 18 years of age;
o
Including “parent” in the definition family class;
o
Reducing the length of the sponsorship requirements from
10 years to 3 years for spouses and common law partners.
SELECITION
OF SKILLED WORKERS
o
Modernizing the selection system for skilled workers,
moving away from an occupation-based model to one focused on flexible and
transferable skills; assigning more weight to education;
o
Increasing the relative weight of having knowledge of an
official language but ensuring that language is not a bar to admission;
o
Creating and “in-Canada landing class” for temporary
workers (including recent graduates from Canadian schools) who have a permanent
job offer and who have been working in Canada.
TEMPORARY
WORKERS
o
Expanding the temporary worker program by facilitating
the entry of temporary workers through a more service-oriented criteria and
pursuing agreements with individuals or firms to identify and meet short-term
labor market needs, while respecting the terms of applicable federal-provincial
agreements.
SPONSORSHIPS
o
Increasing sponsorship obligations by preventing people
in default of court-ordered spousal or child support payments from sponsoring;
o
Preventing individuals convicted of a crime related to
domestic violence from sponsoring, unless a pardon has been granted or rehabilitation
has been demonstrated;
o
In addition, the government is attempting to implement
provisions that will enable it to recover the cost of social assistance in
cases of sponsorship default;
o
Individuals on social assistance will not be permitted to
sponsor.
BUSINESS
IMMIGRANTS
o
Business immigration will be more tightly controlled,
establishing objective criteria to assess business experience for both
investors and entrepreneurs and creating a new “net worth” requirement for
entrepreneurs, to be implemented by regulation.
RESIDENCY
REQUIREMENTS
o
Permanent residences will be subject to a “physical
residency” requirement. To retain
permanent resident status, a person will have to be physically present
in Canada for a cumulative period of 2 years for every 5 working years. People who spend time overseas for specific
reasons, such as to accompany a Canadian citizen or to work for a Canadian
employer, or for humanitarian reasons, will retain their status. The government will also attempt to develop
a fraud-resistant permanent resident card.
ENFORCCEMENT
Another
area where drastic changes will take effect if the new legislation is approved
is enforcement, with increased penalties for violators. The main changes proposed are as follows:
o
Increase in penalties for
existing offences;
o
Creating a new offence for human
trafficking;
o
Extending Criminal Code
counterfeiting provisions, which currently apply to passports, to cover any
migration document or travel document, with an exemption for refugees;
o
Allowing for a seizure of assets
in case of migrant smuggling and trafficking;
o
Provide new authority to seizing
citizenship documents to prevent fraud;
o
Creating a new offence for
people who counsel a person to misrepresent himself or herself or to commit an
offence under the Act;
o
Creating a new offence for the
possession and laundering of proceeds for immigration offences;
o
Raising the penalty to life in
prison for migrant smuggling and trafficking.
EMPLOYERS
MUST EXERCISE DUE DILIGENCE:
The new legislation prohibits
the employment of a foreign national who is not otherwise authorized to work in
Canada and imposes the requirement of due diligence to be exercised by
employers to satisfy themselves that a foreign national has the required
authorization. It must be noted that
the legislation deems failure to exercise due diligence a contravention of the
provisions of the new Act, enabling potential prosecution of employers.
Although due diligence is also a defense under the new Act, employers will be
required to exercise great caution when hiring foreign nationals, to avoid
liability.
MAKING AND
COUNSELLING FALSE STATEMENTS
The new legislation provides
tough penalties for those who knowingly make false statements or counsel
others to do so. These provisions seem
to be specifically aimed at certain individuals, who routinely counsel their
“clients” to misrepresent, mislead or present false information to Immigration
officials, whether orally or in writing.
The text of these important provisions is as follows:
126. Every
person who knowingly counsels, induces, aids or abets or attempts to counsel,
induce, aid or abet any person to directly or indirectly misrepresent or
withhold material facts relating to a relevant matter that induces or could
induce an error in the administration of this Act is guilty of an offence.
127. No
person shall knowingly:
(a) directly or indirectly
misrepresent or withhold material facts relating to a relevant matter that
induces or could induce an error in the administration of this Act;
(b) communicate, directly or
indirectly, by any means, false or misleading information or declarations with
intent to induce or
(c) refuse to be sworn or to
affirm or , as the case may be, or to answer a question put to the person at an
examination or at a proceeding held under this Act
128. A
person who contravenes a provision of section 126 or 127 is guilty of an
offence and liable :
(a) on conviction on
indictment, to a fine of not more than $100,000 or to imprisonment
for a term of not more than five years, or to both; or
(b) on summary conviction, to a
fine of not more than $50,000 or to imprisonment for a term of
not more than two years, or to both.
Employers will have to be
particularly careful when applying for employment authorizations on behalf of
employees, to avoid potential liability. For example, if an employer applies
for an authorization for a short period of time for an employee who may
otherwise be subject to a medical examination (citizens of certain countries
are subject to a medical examination requirement if they will be in Canada for
more than six months) it could be construed as attempting to defeat the
administration of the Act if the employee remains in Canada longer than
expected and an extension of his status is necessary, provided the “real”
length of stay was known at the outset of the initial application. Also, if an
employer is found to have counseled an employee to make inaccurate statements
upon entry to Canada, it could potentially be subject to prosecution. Caution
will have to be exercised at all times when dealing with any applications for
status in Canada.
EXCLUSION
FROM THE REFUGEE DETERMINATION SYSTEM
o
Serious criminals will be denied
access to the Refugee Determination System;
o
A “serious criminal” is defined
as someone who has been convicted of an offence punishable by 10 years or more
and who has received a sentence of 2 years or more in Canada. People convicted of an offence punishable by
10 years or more outside Canada will only be excluded if the Minister
finds them to be a danger to the public.
As it can be readily seen, those who make or counsel others to make false statements will face very severe penalties.
ELIMINATING
APPEALS
o
People who present a security
risk, serious criminals, members of criminal organizations or war criminals,
will no longer have access to an appeal at the Immigration Appeal Division, but
will continue to have recourse to judicial review with leave by the Federal
Court.
Those who are interested in immigration to Canada must
note that, since the Bill has just been introduced, it will take some time
until it is debated by Parliament and eventually passed. This provides a window of opportunity to
file applications for permanent residence immediately, which will
continue to be subject to the current legislation until the new Bill comes into
effect.
For further information please contact Sergio R. Karas,
B.A., LL.B, at (416) 506-1800 or email at skaras@hirson.com